نوع مقاله : علمی ـ پژوهشی
نویسنده
فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد/ حوزه علمیه خراسان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Logicians have considered unanimous traditions as certainties. They considered the attainment of certainty through successive transmission to be conditional on the flow of successive transmission in the field of perceptibles; In the sense that what has been repeatedly narrated is useful certainty if it belongs to perceptible something. With this condition, they set aside the successive transmission of intelligible objects and do not consider it useful for certainty. The main problem of the current writing is to examine the flow of the successive transmission in the area of contemplated imperfect beings; It's like near-death experiences; Things that are not perceptible so that their successive transmission is useful for certainty according to logicians, and are not obtained through thinking and reasoning so that their multiple reports do not bring logical certainty according to logicians, but are visible to man without the mediation of external senses and thinking. Is the multiple narration of such events from the point of view of Avicennian Logic and according to its foundations, like the successive transmission of perceptible things useful for logical certainty? It is clear that the acceptance of obtaining certainty through the successive transmission of contemplated imperfect beings provides the basis for their use in the premises of the argument. The following article, by analyzing the process of obtaining certainty in the successive transmission of perceptible things from the perspective of Avicennian Logic, tries to prove the possibility of obtaining certainty through the successive transmission of contemplated imperfect beings.
کلیدواژهها [English]