نوع مقاله : علمی ـ پژوهشی
نویسنده
دکترای حکمت هنر دینی، دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب. قم. ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
Disinterestedness in the aesthetics means that the aesthetic judgment should be free or pure of any interests including cognitive, moral, and beneficial satisfactions. In other words, the aesthetic judgments should be grounded in disinterestedness in the sense of not being based on my mental desire, what is good, and what is morally good for me. Although the issue had been coined in the philosophy of Kant and has been introduced as one of the innovations of his aesthetics, studying Avicenna's thoughts on pleasure and beauty reveals that he, also, emphasized the issue. He used the specific term of “Mola'em” defining as agreeableness and pleasure. In his opinion, Mola'em is the perfection and goodness of perceptive faculty or special action of the faculty. He emphasized that pleasure was perceived solely by the Mola'em so other things like agreeable, what is good for the perceiver, and what is morally good do not interfere to obtain Mola'em or pleasure in the faculty. Since the perceiving of beauty is limited in obtaining Mola'em or perceiving pleasure, the concept of disinterestedness in his aesthetics is apprehensible. Kant discussed four particular unique features of aesthetic judgments and calls them ‘moments. One of them is the disinterestedness in aesthetic judgments. So, his argument is more obvious and deeper than Avicenna's. Therefore, first, I present a comprehensive review of Avicenna’s thoughts on beauty and his idea about disinterestedness in perceiving pleasure and beauty by the descriptive-analytical method. Then, I would compare it with the idea of Kant about the disinterestedness in aesthetics. The results show that the disinterestedness described by Avicenna and Kant is similar. So, we can claim that the concept that Kant has focused on, had already been noted by Avicenna.
کلیدواژهها [English]
', './data/ap/coversheet/51641714244.jpg'))