عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
For the first time in the history of philosophy, Aristotle propounded the theory of four causes and used it as a means for the study of the structure of natural events and justification of changes in the world. Causes in the philosophy of Aristotle both bring about the actualization of a thing in external world and makes it possible to know it. Ibn Sina by using numerous sources of thought, from neo – Platonism to religious ideas in Islam interpreted causality in a different way and through it he could explain the order of creation philosophically. Causality in the philosophical system of Ibn Sina turns round the concept of existence, not movement; and causality explains the being of existences and not only their movements. Thus, despite the fact that causality and its functions have a pivotal role both in the philosophy of Ibn Sina and Aristotle, but the attitude of these two philosophers to this theory has been different. It seems that this difference has been formed by a mutual interaction with the development of the meaning of causes for clarification of the reason of this difference. It is necessary to explain the meaning of causality according to these two philosophers well so that it becomes clear that what kinds of word each of these two philosophers used for causality and cause and what kind of meaning and usage they expected of them.
کلیدواژهها English
عنوان مقاله العربیة
تحلیل معنى العلة فی فلسفة ارسطو و ابنسیناء
چکیده العربیةکلیدواژهها العربیة
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,745 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,520 |
حکمت سینوی (مشکوه النور)