Avicenna’s Philosophy in Confrontation with the Sharī‘ah

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas.Iran
2 Department of Theology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Bu-Ali Sina, Hamedan. Iran
Abstract
The relationship between religion and philosophy in the thought of Muslim philosophers—particularly Avicenna—constitutes one of the fundamental issues in Islamic philosophy. Avicenna, drawing on Aristotelian rationalism, regards reason as the ultimate basis for the discovery of truth, and organizes the domains of being and knowledge accordingly. This study, employing a descriptive–analytical method and based on library sources, seeks to examine the epistemic status of religion within Avicenna’s intellectual system and to address the question of whether religion can be accorded an independent and distinct position apart from the rational structure of philosophy, or whether it is always defined and interpreted in relation to philosophical reason. An analysis of the duality between reason and faith in the issue of bodily resurrection, the symbolic reading of Qur’anic verses in Avicenna’s interpretation, and the unequal reconciliation of religion and philosophy shows that, in his view, religion is valid only insofar as it accords with philosophical reason. Although Avicenna endeavors to maintain harmony between reason and revelation, in practice religion is accepted only when it can be aligned with rational principles; otherwise, it is either subjected to allegorical interpretation or reduced to a symbolic level, thereby deprived of any independent epistemic standing. By distinguishing between the levels of human understanding, Avicenna conceives philosophy as an elite form of knowledge that apprehends truth in an abstract and universal manner, whereas religion addresses the masses through imagery, imagination, and allegory. Thus, in his intellectual framework, religion is largely subordinated to the rational and metaphysical structure of philosophy rather than occupying an independent and intrinsic place of its own.
Keywords
Subjects

 
 
Refrence
 
Avicenna. (1371/1992). Al-Mubāḥathāt (The Discussions) (Edited and Annotated by Mohsen Beidādfar). Qom: Bidar. (Arabīc)
Avicenna. (1376/1997). Al-Ilāhīyāt min al-Shifā’ (The Metaphysics of al-Shifā’) (Ed. by Hasan Hassanzadeh Amoli). Qom: Islamic Propagation Office. (Arabīc)
Avicenna. (1379/2000). Al-Najāh (The Deliverance) (2nd ed.). Tehran: University of Tehran. (Arabīc)
Avicenna. (1382/2003). Al-Aḍḥawiyyah fī al-Ma‘ād (Treatise on Resurrection) (Ed. by Hasan ‘Āṣī). Tehran: Shams Tabrizi. (Arabīc)
Avicenna. (1404 AH/1984). Al-Ta‘liqāt (The Notes) (Ed. by ‘Abd al-Raḥmān Badawi). Qom: Maktab al-I‘lāmi al-Islāmi. (Arabīc)
Avicenna. (1405 AH/1985a). Manṭiq al-Mashriqiyyīn (Eastern Philosophy). Qom: Ayatollah Mar‘ashī Najafī Library. (Arabīc)
Avicenna. (1405 AH/1985b). Al-Manṭiq min al-Shifā’ (Logic from the Book of Healing). Qom: Ayatollah Mar‘ashī Najafī Library. (Arabīc)
Avicenna. (1381/2002). Al-Ishārāt wa al-Tanbīhāt (Pointers and Reminders). Qom: Bustan-e Ketab. (Arabīc)
Avicenna. (1938). Al-Najāh fī al-Ḥikma al-Manṭiqiyya wa al-Ṭabī‘iyya wa al-Ilāhiyya. Cairo: Matba‘at al-Sa‘āda. (in Arabic)
Avicenna. (1953). Rasā’il Ibn Sīnā (Collected Treatises) (Ed. by Hilmi Ziya Ülken). Turkey: Ibrahim Khuruz Printing. (in Arabic)
Avicenna. (2005). Maḥbath ‘an al-Quwā al-Nafsānīyah: aw Kitāb fī al-Nafs (Ed. by Edward van Dyck). Beirut: Lebanon. (in Arabic)
Avicenna. (2007). Aḥwāl al-Nafs (States of the Soul) (Ed. by Ahmad Fu’ād Ahwānī). Paris: Dar Biblion. (in Arabic)
Ashtiyani, J. (1381/2002). Sharḥ bar Zād al-Musāfir (Commentary on Avicenna's Zad al-Musāfir). Qom: Bustan-e Ketab. (in Persian)
Aristotle. (1385/2006). Metaphysics (Ma‘bād al-Ṭabī‘a) (Trans. by Mohammad Hassan Lotfi). Tehran: Tarh-e Now. (in Persian)
Adamson, P ; Benevich, Fedor. (2023). TheHeirs of Avicenna: Philosophy in the Islamic East, 12–13th Centuries (Metaphysics andTheology). Londen: Brill. Corbin, H. (1960). Avicenna and the Visionary Recital. Bollingen Series LXVI. New York: Princeton University Press.
 
Al-Shirazi, (2004). Sadr al-Din Muhammad. Sharh Usul al-Kafi (Mohammad Khajavi, ed.). Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. (Arabīc)
 
Al-Shirazi, (2008). Sadr al-Din Muhammad. Tafsir al-Quran al-Karim. Qom: Foundation for Islamic Wisdom Sadra, (Arabīc).
 
al-Kindī. (1950). Rasāʾil al-Kindī al-Falsafiyya. Muhammad ʿAbdulhādī Abūrīda. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr al. (Arabīc).
 
Janssen, J. (2005). Avicenna and the Qur’an: A Survey of His Qur’anic Commentary. MEDIO, 26(6), 177–192.
Hosseini, S. Z. (1400/2021). “An Analysis of Avicenna’s Philosophical-Esoteric Method in Interpreting the Qur’an.” Tafsīrpazhūhī, 8(15), 31–52. (in Persian)
Hakimi, M. R. (1381/2002). Ma‘ād Jismānī dar Ḥekmat-e Muta‘āliya (Corporeal Resurrection in Transcendent Philosophy) (2nd ed.). Qom: Dalil-e Ma. (in Persian)
Humaidi, Y. R. (2023). Light in The Qur’an: Ibn Sina’s Psycho-Philosophical Interpretation of Surah Al-Nūr. Jurnal Afkaruna, 19(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v19i1.16381
 
Ghaffari, H. (1391/2012). “The Place of Philosophy of Religion in the Islamic Tradition According to Avicenna.” Pazhūheshnāmeh-ye Falsafe-ye Dīn, 10(2), 47–64. (in Persian)
Fana’i Ashkuri, M. (1401/2022). An Introduction to the History of Islamic Philosophy. Tehran: SAMT. (in Persian)
 Farabi, Abu Nasr. Kitab al-Millah wa Nusus al-Akhra (Edited by Mohsen Mahdi). Beirut: Dar al-Mashriq; 1991. (Arabīc).
Kamalizadeh, T. (1401/2022). “The Relationship Between Philosophy and Sharia in Avicennan Thought.” Jostārhā-ye Falsafe-ye Dīn, 11(2), 263–290. (in Persian)
 
Yasrebi, S. Y. (1386/2007). Mashshā’ī Philosophy. 2nd ed. Qom: Bustan-e Ketab. (in Persian)
Mohammadi, N. (1399/2020). “Reflections on the Nature of Revelation and Qur’anic Language According to Avicenna.” Pazhūheshnāmeh-ye Tafsir va Zabān-e Qur’ān, 16, 65–76. (in Persian)