Sense Perception and Illusion in Aristotle and Ibn Sina

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.

2 M.A. in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

The perception is one of the new fields of contemporary philosophy, which focuses on the main object of perception and the possibility of ordinary conception of perception. The core of the problem of perception is illusion and hallucination; In such a way that the response to the problem of illusion and hallucination is considered to determine our response to the true object of perception. Aristotle and Muslim Peripatetic Philosophers, especially Ibn Sina, paid attention to sensory error, but they did not consider it as a basis for the theory of perception. In this paper, relying on the argument of sensory error, we show that there are two meanings of sensory error in Aristotle, which lead to two conceptions of perception: The meaning that requires the sense data interpretation leads to the acceptance of indirect realism, and the meaning that requires the material object interpretation leads to the acceptance of direct realism. Commentators and philosophers after Avicenna, especially Tousi, often considering something similar to sense data interpretation, have promoted a kind of indirect realism interpretation from Avicenna’s views, which has finally been accepted as the theory of mental existence. We show that according to Razi’s considerations, it is possible to interpret a material object interpretation for sensory error in Ibn Sina, just like Aristotle, and therefore, a kind of direct realism can be attributed to Ibn Sina, which is consistent with sensory and imaginary perception being material in Ibn Sina’s philosophy.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Al-Razi, Fakhr al-Din (1990a). Al-Muhassal. Cairo: Dar ul-Turath Publisher. [In Arabic]
Al-Razi, Fakhr al-Din (1990b). Al-Mabahith ul-Mashriqiyyah. Qom: Bidar Publications. [In Arabic]
Al-Razi, Fakhr al-Din (1998). Sharh ‘Uyun al-Hikmah (Commentary on ‘Uyun al-Hikmah). Tehran: Sadiq Institute. [In Arabic]
Al-Razi, Fakhr al-Din (2005). Sharh al-Isharat va al-Tanbihat. Tehran: Society for Cultural Works and Dignitaries
Aristotle (1984). The Complete Works of Aristotle Vol. I Rev Jonathan Barnes (ed) (p. 25). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Block, Irving (1961). Truth and error in Aristotle's theory of sense perception. Philosophical Quarterly, 11(42), 1-9.
Broad, C. D. (1923). Scientific Thought. Paterson, N.J. : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Broadie, Sarah (1993). Aristotle’s Perceptual Realism. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 31(S1), 137-159.
Caston, Victor (1996). Why Aristotle Needs Imagination. Phronesis, 41(1), 20-55.
Caston, Victor (1998). Aristotle and the Problem of Intentionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 58(2), 249-298.
Crane, Tim & French, Craig (2021). The Problem of Perception. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/perception-problem.
Esfeld, Michael (2000). Aristotle’s Direct Realism In De Anima. Review of Metaphysics, 54(2), 321 - 336.
Everson, S. (1995). Proper Sensibles and Καθ᾽ Αὑτά Causes. Phronesis, 40(3), 265–292.
Farabi, Muhammad ibn Muhammad (1987). Al-Mantiqiyyat. Qom: Ayatullah Mar’shai Najafi Public Library. [In Arabic]
Farabi, Muhammad ibn Muhammad (1995). Opinions of The Inhabitants of The Virtuous City. Beirut: Al-Hilal Publishers. [In Arabic]
Farabi, Muhammad ibn Muhammad (1996). Ihsa’ al-‘Ulum. Beirut: Al-Hilal Publishers. [In Arabic]
Foster, John, (2000). The Nature of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hicks, R. D. & Aristotle (eds.) (1907). Aristotle: De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Ibn Sina (1978). Kitab al-Insaf. In Badawī, ʿA., 1947, Arisṭū ʿinda l-ʿArab, Cairo: Maktabat an-nahḍa al-miṣriyya. [In Arabic].
Ibn Sina (1980). Treatises. Qom: Bidar Publications. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina (1984). al-Mabda’ va l-Ma’ad. Tehran: Islamic Studies Institute. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina (1984). Al-Tabi’iyyat min Kitab il-Shifa. Qom: Ayatollah Mar’ashi Najafi Public library. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina (1984b). Al-Ta’liqat. Qom: Islamic Development Bureau. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina (1985). Al-Mantiq min Kitab al-Shifa. Qom: Ayatollah Mar’ashi Najafi Public library. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina (1996a). al-Nafs min Kitab al-Shifa. (Hasanzadeh Amoli Ed.), Qom: Publication Center of Islamic Development Organization. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina (1996b).al-Isharat va al-Tanbihat. Qom: Balagheh. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina (1998). Risalat al-Hukumah fi Ibtali Hujaj il-Musbitin lil-Mazi Mabda’an Zamaniyyan in Risalat al-Hudus il-Alam. Tehran: Islamic Studies Institute. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina (2000). al-Najah min al-gharq fi Bahr il-Zalalat. Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Arabic]
Ibn Sina (2004). Philosophy for ʿAlāʾ-ad-Dawla (Dāneshnāme-ye ʿAlāʾī). Hamadan: Bu Ali University. [In Farsi]
Ibn Sina (2007). Risala fi l-Nafs. Paris: Babylion. [In Arabic]
Jackson, Frank (1977) Perception: A Representative Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnstone, Mark, A (2015). Aristotle and Alexander on Perceptual Error. Phronesis 60(3), 310-338.
Johnstone, Mark, A (2022). Aristotle on the Objects of Perception. In Cohoe, Caleb M.(ed.) Aristotle’s ‘On the Soul’: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press. pp.  155-173.
Kalderon, Mark (2015). Form Without Matter: Empedocles and Aristotle on Color Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kalderon, Mark, (2011), Color Illusion, Noûs, 45: 751–775.
Marmodoro, Anna (2014). Aristotle on Perceiving Objects. New York, NY: Oup Usa.
Matthen, Mohan (2019). Is the Eye Like What It Sees? A Critique of Aristotle on Sensing by Assimilation. Vivarium, 57 (3-4), 268-292.
Mirrahimi, F. Saeedimehr, M. Karimzadeh, O. (2020). .Reconstruction of the argument from illusion for the theory of mental existence in the light of the arguments for the sense data theory .Epistemological Researches. 19(), 7-23.
Modrak, D. K. (1986). Chapter Seven. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy, 2(1), 209-236.
Mokhtari, M. H. (2020). A Comparative Study on the views of Aristotle, Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra on the Function of Sensory Perception and its Epistemological Value. SADRĀ’I WISDOM, 8(2), 203-214. doi: 10.30473/pms.2020.49157.1740
Moore, G. E.  (1910), “Selected Writings”, edited by Thomas Baldwin London: Routledge. 45–58.
Moore, G. E. (1919), Some judgements of perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 19:1--29.
Owens, J. (1982). Aristotle on Common Sensibles and Incidental Perception. Phoenix, 36(3), 215–236.
Parsaei, J., Gorjian, M. M., & Abdi, H. (2022). The Analysis and Review of the Challenges and Solutions to the Issue of “Perceptual Illusion” in Islamic Wisdom. Islamic Philosophical Doctrines, 17(30), 79-104. doi: 10.30513/ipd.2021.3112.1261
Price, Henry Habberley (1932). Perception. Westport, Conn.: Methuen & Co..
Rahimpour, F., & Zareh, F. (2015). Khajeh Nasir al-Din Tusi and Allameh Tabatabaei on Decoding the Occurrence of Error in Sensory Perceptions. Contemporary Wisdom, 6(1), 41-65.
Robinson, Howard (1994). Perception, London: Routledge.
Scheiter, Krisanna, M. (2012). Images, Appearances, and Phantasia in Aristotle. Phronesis, 57(3), 251-278.
Shahidi, S. S. (2019). A New Approach on The Possibility of Knowing the Essence of Things According to Avicennian Philosophy. Avecinnian Philosophy Journal, 22(60), 71-85. doi: 10.30497/ap.2019.71975
Shirazi, Muhammad ibn Ibrahim (1996). Al-Shawahid al-Rububiyyah fi l-Manahij al Sulukiyyah. Beirut: Arabic History Institute. [In Arabic]
Tabatabai, Mohammadhosein (1983). Nihayat al-Hikmah. Qom: Islamic Publication Institute. [In Arabic]
Tabatabai, Mohammadhosein (2011). The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism. Tehran: Sadra. [In Farsi]
Tusi, Nasir al-Din (1980). Naqd al-Muhassal. Tehran: Tehran and Mcgil University. [In Arabic]
Tusi, Nasir al-Din (1986). Tajrid al-I’tiqad. Tehran: Publication Center of Islamic Development Center.
Tusi, Nasir al-Din (1996). Sharh al-Isharat va al-Tanbihat ( ma’a al-Muhakimat). Qom: Nalaghah Publications. [In Arabic]
Twomey, Rosemary (2021). Phantasia and Error. In Caleb M. Cohoe (ed.), Aristotle's on the Soul: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Varzdar, K., Gharamaleki, A. F., & Kashfi, A. R. (2021). A Comparative Study of Aristotle and Fārābī’s Views on Illusion. Philosophy and Kalam, 54(1), 246-227. doi: 10.22059/jitp.2021.312899.523237
Avecinnian Philosophy Journal
Volume 28, Issue 71
April 2024
Pages 253-275

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics