The Role of Abstraction in Intellectual Knowledge According to Avicenna

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Author

Assistant Professor at the Department of Philosophy, Al-e Taha Institute, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

According to Ibn Sina, knowledge occurs when the perceiver acquires the intellectual form of the perceived object. The perception of the material depends on the abstraction of these intellectual forms. Perception, based on the degree to which the perceptual form is abstracted from its material components, is divided into sensory, imaginary, and intellectual categories. Ibn Sina views the human soul as inherently intellectual, with its primary function being the acquisition of intellectual knowledge. Other types of perception are considered material and exist within the soul only through its connection to the body. Reasoning has a close connection with the active intellect (al-ʿaql al-faʿʿāl), which serves as the catalyst for the emergence of intellectual forms and the intellectualization of the perceiver. In current interpretations of Ibn Sina's work, abstraction is deemed a necessary condition for intellectual knowledge, and it plays an essential role in the process of acquiring intellectual knowledge. Nevertheless, there are instances in his work where intellectual knowledge is achieved without abstraction, solely through a connection (ittiṣāl) to the active intellect.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1984). The principle and the return. Abdollah Noorani. Tehran: Institute of Islamic Studies.
Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1992). al-Mubāḥathāt. Qom: Bidar.
Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1996). al-Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt. Qom: al-Belaqeh.
Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1985), al-Najāt, Text in M.T. Dāneshpaǰūh, ed., Tehran: Tehran University Publications.
Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1979). Rasael. Qom: Bidar.
Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1981-A). al-Taʿlīqāt. A. Badawī. Beirut: Islamic Media Library.
Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1981-B). al-Shifāʾ (Physics). Saeid Zayed. Qom: Ayatollah Marashi Library.
Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1981-C). al-Shifāʾ (Ilāhiyyāt / Metaphysics). Saeid Zayed. Qom: Ayatollah Marashi Library.
Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1992). al-Nafs al-Shifāʾ. Hasan Hasanzadeh Amoli. Qom: The publishing center of the Islamic Information Office.
Ibn-Sīnā, al-Ḥusayn ibn-ʿAbdallāh (1995). Rejection and benefits in natural science. Included in Islamic Philosophy, Fuad Sezgin. Vol.34, Frankfurt University, Institute for the History of Arab and Islamic Sciences.
Alvandian, Masoomeh & Allahbedashti, Ali (2018). Comparative study of Ibn-e-Sina and Mulla Sadra's view on the process of rational perception. Reason and Religion, Volume 10, Issue 19, October 2018, Pages 69-88.
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad (1982). al-Shawahid al-rububiyya fi manahij al-sulukiyya. Sayed Jalalodin Asheiani. Mashahd: University Center for Publishing.
Sadr al-Din Shirazi, Muhammad (2002). Sharh al-ilahiyyat min Kitab al-Shifa’. Tehran: Sadra Islamic Philosophy Foundation.
Naṣīr-ad-Dīn al-Ṭūsī (1997), Sharh Ishārāt wa-l-tanbīhāt, Qom: al-Belaqeh.
Qafari Ghare Bagh, Ahmad & Hamzeh, Hamzeh (2015). Survey & Critique Avicenna's Existential Theory about Rational Perception. Ayeneh Marefat, Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 1-19
Abû Nasr al-Fârâbî (1995). Ara Ahl al-Madina al-Fadila. Ali Bomolhem. Beirut: Al Hilal House and Library.
Avecinnian Philosophy Journal
Volume 26, Issue 68
October 2022
Pages 75-90

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics