A Study of Avicenna's View on How Composition in Material Objects Based on the Theory of Hylomorphism

Document Type : Scholarly Article

Author

Ph.D in Islamic Philosophy, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

In this article, we have examined and analyzed Avicenna's view of composition in material objects under the theory of Hylomorphism. First, we showed that the issue of composition of material objects according to existing definitions has logical and metaphysical problems regarding the presence of material components in the composition. Then, we proposed a new idea of true composition, but this new idea is not corresponding with Avicenna's other principles, so it would be flawed in this view. In the second step, by reconstructing Sabzevari's argument, we have shown that the concrete composition (considered by Avicenna) is more acceptable because it does not face any logical problems compared to the union composition. In the third step, we examined the true composition based on the condition of the material components and the formal components. At this stage, six possible and different options were presented about the metaphysical condition of matter and form, and we answered two issues with their design: A) which option is closer to Avicenna's view? B) Which option is more acceptable? Finally, in forth section, we showed from another angle that the analysis of composition from Avicenna's point of view is not also possible through instantiation of the relation of solution or belonging. But this Avicenna' statement can't be an answer to the issue of composition because it is not informative and is a kind of similarity.  

Keywords

Main Subjects


ابن‌سینا، حسین بن عبدالله (1379). النجاة من الغرق فی البحر الضلالات (محمدتقی دانش‌پژوه، مصحح). تهران دانشگاه تهران.
ابن‌سینا، حسین بن عبدالله (1404ق-الف). الشفاء: الإلهیات (سعید زائد و الأب قنواتی، مصححان). قم: کتابخانۀ آیت‌الله مرعشی نجفی.
ابن‌سینا، حسین بن عبدالله (1404ق-ب). الشفاء: الطبیعیات (سعید زائد، محقق). قم: کتابخانۀ آیت‌الله مرعشی نجفی.
ارسطو (1389). مابعدالطبیعه (متافیزیک) (محمدحسن لطفی تبریزی، مترجم). تهران: نشر نو.
شیرازی، سید رضی (1392). درس‌های شرح منظومۀ حکیم سبزواری. تهران: حکمت.
صدرالدین شیرازی، محمد بن ابراهیم (1981). الحکمة المتعالیة فی الأسفار العقلیة الأربعة. بیروت: دار احیاء التراث العربی.
طباطبایی، سید محمدحسین (1391). نهایة الحکمة (علی شیروانی، مترجم و شارح). قم: دار الفکر.
عبودیت، عبدالرسول (1393). درآمدی به نظام حکمت صدرایی. تهران: سمت.
کاپلستون، فردریک چارلز (1396). تاریخ فلسفه: یونان و روم. تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
مطهری، مرتضی (1369). مجموعۀ آثار (جلد 2: جامعه و تاریخ). تهران: صدرا.
مطهری، مرتضی (1371). مجموعۀ آثار (جلد 5: شرح منظومه). تهران: صدرا.
میرداماد، محمدباقر (1381). الایماضات: مصنفات میرداماد (عبدالله نورانی، به‌اهتمام) (جلد 1). تهران: انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی.
Banach, David (2007). What Killed Substantial Form?. Saint Anselm Journal, 5(1).
Fine, Kite (1994). A Puzzle Concerning Matter and Form. In: T. Scaltsas; D. Charles; and M. L. Gill (Eds). Unity, Identity and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 13-40.
Fine, Kite (1999). Things and Their Parts. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XXIII.
Hill, Benjamin (2007). Substantial Forms and the Rise of Modern Science. Saint Anselm Journal, 5(1).
Koons, Robert (2014). Staunch VS. Faint-Hearted Hylomorphism. Toward an Aristotelian Account of Composition, Res Philosophical, 91(2), 151-177.
Koslicki, Kathrin (2007). Towards a Neo-Aristotelian Mereology. Dialectica, 16(1), 127-159.
Kripke, Saul (1972). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marmodoro, Anna (2013). Aristotle’s Hylomorphism without Reconditioning. Philosophical Inquiry, 36, 5-22.
Pasnau, Robert (2011). Metaphysical Themes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scaltsas, Theodore (1994). Substances and Universals in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press.
Van Inwagen, Peter (1990). Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.