This article aims to review the theory of peripatetic hylomorphism and its foundations in the face of new physical perspectives (theory of Atom). For this purpose, two competing views of this theory in the history of Islamic philosophy, that is, the theory attributed to the Stoics (by Abolbarakat and Suhrawardi) and Atomism in its philosophical (small solid objects) and theology interpretations (a substance that cannot be further broken down), have been studied. Then, the approach of contemporary thinkers towards the theory of hylomorphism is examined. Furthermore, it has been shown that their views can be divided into three groups. Two groups of them have rejected the theory of hylomorphism. Furthermore, each of them has somehow supported one of its historically rival theories. Mohyeddin Elahi Ghomshei and Hassanzadeh Amoli have become interested in Atomism, and Mesbah Yazdi and Fayyazi have tended to the theory attributed to the Stoics. Others such as Fazel Touni and Allameh Tabataba’i have tried to somehow reconcile this theory with the theory of small solid objects and a new perspective on physics. Nevertheless, some of the foundations of hylomorphism theory face various philosophical and empirical challenges. Such as knowing that the body is connected, the body parts are not present, and that the prime matter (Hyle) still exists.
Anvari, Saeed (spring & summer 1395a), “Tafavot Hey’at dar Hekmat Eshragh ba ’araz dar Hekmat Masha”, Shenakht, No: 74, P. 23-38.
___________ (atumn & winter 1395b), “Negaresh Falsafi ’allameh Tabataba’i va Ostad Motahari be do Ghanoun Fiziki (Ghanon Aval Nyoton va Ghanoun Baghaye Made va Enerjhi”, Andisheye ’allameh Tabataba’i, Year: 7, No: 5, P. 7-30.
Ohanian, Hans si (1372), Phyzik Nowin, Translated by: Jalal al-Din Pashaee Rad and Bahram Mo’lemi, Tehran, Mad publisher.
Bahmanyar ibn al-Marzban (1375), al-Tahsil, Edited by: Morteza Motahari, Tehran, Tehran University Publisher.
Tarabaran, Zahra and ’abas Javareshkian (atumn & winter 1392), “Chisti va Hasti Madeh”, Motale’at Eslami: Falsafeh va Kalam, Year: 45, No: 91, P. 31-56.
Teylor, Keristofer Charlz Visten (1390), Tarikh Falsafeye Ratlej (Vol 1: Az Aghaz ta Aflatoun), Translate: Hasan Mortazavi, Tehran, Nashr Cheshmeh.
Hasanzadehye Amoli, Hasan (1393), Dorous Sharh Esharat va al-Tanbyhat, Namat Aval (physics), Qom, Ayat Eshragh.
________________________ (1379b), Hezar va Yek Kalameh, Qom, Boustane Ketab.
Hoseyni, Davoud and Reza Darghahifar (atumn & winter 1399), “Tarkib Etehadi az manzare Sadroddin Dashtaki”, Javidan Kherad, No: 38, P. 123-149.
Helli, Hasan ibn Yousof (1387), al-Asrar al-Khafiyyah fi al-’oloum al-Aghliyah, Edited by: Markaz Ehya al-Toras al-Eslami, Qom, Boustan Ketab.
___________________ (1417), Kashf al-Morad fi Sharh Tajrid al-e’teghad, Edited by: Hasan Hasanzadeh Amoli, Qom, Moaseseh al-Nashr al-Eslami.
Dashtaki, Ghyas al-Din Mansour (1386), Mosanafat Gheyas al-Din Mansour Hoseyni Dashtaki Shirazi, Edited by: ’abdollah Nourani, Tehran, Anjoman Asar va Mafakher Farhangi and Tehran University.
Rizi, Esma’il ibn Mohammad (1377), Hayat al-Nofous (Falsafeye Eshragh in Persian), Edited by: Mohammad Taghi Daneshpajhouh, Tehran, Moghoufat Dr. Mahmoud Afshar Publisher.
Zare’i, Zohreh and Amir Shirzad (spring & summer 1396), “Barresi Enteghadat Mollasadra bar Sohravardi dar Bahse Haghighate Jesm”, Pajhohesh-haye Hastishenakhti, Year: 6, No: 11, P. 85-106.
Sa’adat Mostafavi, Seyed Hasan (1395), Tabi’yat (Sharhe Namat Aval az Ketab al-Esharat va al-Tanbihat), by: Majid Shams Abadi and Omid Arjmand, Tehran, Emam Sadegh University.
Solymani, Fatemeh (spring & summer 1386), “Madeh az Neghah Fizik va Falsafeh”, Meshkat al-Nour (Hekmat Sinavi), No: 36-37, P. 20-55.
Souri, Rouh Allah (atumn & winter 1396), “Naghd va Barresi Didghah Masha Mabni bar Besatate Jesm az Ajzaye Belfe’l ba Ta’kid bar Didghah ’allameh Hasanzadeh, Nasime Kherad, Year: 3, No: 5, P. 67-86.
Shahnazari, Ja’far and Hasan ’azizi (summer 1391), “Barresi va Tahlil Mahiyat Jesm az Didigah Masha va Eshragh”, Pajhouhesh-haye Ma’refat Shenakhti, Series: 1, No: 2, P. 137-152.
Sha’rani, Mirza abou al-Hasan (1386), Falsafeye Oola ya Maba’daltabi’e, part of the book: Zendeginame va Khadamat ’elmi va Farhangi ’alameh Mirza abou al-Hasan Sha’rani, Tehran, Anjoman Asar va Mafakher Farhangi.
Ghafari, Hoseyn and Mohammad Mehdi Kamali (spring & summer 1397), “Ta’amoli dar Tabyeen Fylsofan Eslami az Talazom beyn Madeh va Sourat”, Ta’amolat Falsafi Zanjan, Year: 8, No: 20, P. 11-40.
Fayazi, Gholam Reza and Ahmad Heydarpour (atumn & winter 1395), “Hayoulaye Falsafi dar Chalesh Manteghi”, Nasime Kherad, Year: 2, No: 2, Series: 3, P. 53-72.
Ghorbani, Rahim (spring 1383), “Pajoheshi Darbareye Haghighat va Mahyat Enerjhi”, Ghabasat, No: 30 &31, P. 293-329.
Kapeleston, Feredrik Charlz (1396), Tarikh Falsafeh (Vol 1: Younan va Rom), Tehran, Elmi va Farhanghi publisher.
Katebi Ghazvini, Ali ibn ’omar (1353), Hekmat al-’eyn va Sharheh, Edited by: Jafar Zahedi, Mashhad, Ferdousi university publisher.
Kazemizadeh, Fatemeh (Mordad va Shahrivar 1376), “Mahiyat Jesm Tabi’e”, Meshkat al-nour (Hekmate Sinavi), No: 1, P. 32-38.
Kerin, Kent S (1379), Phyzik Jadid, Translate by Manijh Rahbar and Bahram Mo’alemi, Tehran, Markaz Nashr Daneshghahi.
Kamali, Mohammad Mehdi and Mohammad Hasan Kamali (atumn 1398), “Barresi va Naghd Barahin Filsofan Eslami bar Ebtal Mazhab Zarregheraee”, Ma’refat Falsafi, Year: 17. No: 1, Series: 65, P. 65-80.
Mulla sadra, Mohammad ibn Ebrahim (1981), al-Hyikmat al-Mote’aliah fi al-Asfar al-Arba’a al-Aghlyiah, Beyrout, Dar al-Ehya al-Toras.
Mirdamad, Mohammad Bagher (1381), al-Eemazat, Mosanafat Mirdamad, Vol: 1, Edited by: ’abdollah Nourani, Tehran, Anjoman Asar va Mafakher Farhangi.
Naji Esfahani, Hamed and Naser Ghasemi (atumn & winter 1395), “Moghayeseye beyn Johar Fard az nazare Motekalleman Eslami va Zarrat Bonyadin dar Fizik Nowin”, Pajhohesh-haye ’elm va Din, Year: 7, No: 2, P. 97-116.
Anvari,S. and Mokhtari,H. (2021). A Study of Different Views of Islamic Philosophers in Critique and Reform of the Peripatetic Hylomorphism. Avecinnian Philosophy Journal, 25(65), 81-112. doi: 10.30497/ap.2021.241435.1542
MLA
Anvari,S. , and Mokhtari,H. . "A Study of Different Views of Islamic Philosophers in Critique and Reform of the Peripatetic Hylomorphism", Avecinnian Philosophy Journal, 25, 65, 2021, 81-112. doi: 10.30497/ap.2021.241435.1542
HARVARD
Anvari S., Mokhtari H. (2021). 'A Study of Different Views of Islamic Philosophers in Critique and Reform of the Peripatetic Hylomorphism', Avecinnian Philosophy Journal, 25(65), pp. 81-112. doi: 10.30497/ap.2021.241435.1542
CHICAGO
S. Anvari and H. Mokhtari, "A Study of Different Views of Islamic Philosophers in Critique and Reform of the Peripatetic Hylomorphism," Avecinnian Philosophy Journal, 25 65 (2021): 81-112, doi: 10.30497/ap.2021.241435.1542
VANCOUVER
Anvari S., Mokhtari H. A Study of Different Views of Islamic Philosophers in Critique and Reform of the Peripatetic Hylomorphism. Avecinnian Philosophy Journal, 2021; 25(65): 81-112. doi: 10.30497/ap.2021.241435.1542